|
Post by rexregis on May 6, 2014 21:19:53 GMT -5
When the org drop v2 comes out CSI said you could make a chain of command so your members know who to report to. It was also said that you could join more than one org this to me means spys will get in, and the last thing I want is for a spy to ruin a ambush or harm us in any way. I think that we should use en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clandestine_cell_system#Classic_models_for_cell_system_operations . this style of leadership is hard to sneak into as everyone only knows what they need to in order to get the job done. No one in the combat branch should know when our smugglers are leaving, unless they are escorts, and no smuggler should ever know about combat ops that are planned. Here is a basic example of how we could use it. cell-leadershipexp.xlsx (9.77 KB) If we had a leak it could be tracked down to who known about it then it can be dealt with.
|
|
|
Post by DAUnHolyKnight on May 6, 2014 23:10:16 GMT -5
Hm this is a very interesting yet brilliant idea. I will definitely do my own research and hopefully Spike and Kal will back this idea %100.
|
|
|
Post by Poop Killer on May 25, 2014 0:53:48 GMT -5
I like it.
|
|
|
Post by Magostop on May 26, 2014 19:22:00 GMT -5
Nice
|
|
MVA
New Member
Posts: 23
|
Post by MVA on Nov 30, 2014 1:53:59 GMT -5
I thought about the exact same thing earlier today. I'm glad to see this has already been suggested.
|
|
|
Post by epiloqueop on Nov 30, 2014 10:22:16 GMT -5
it like italian mafia structure which best to keep intel among ourselves
|
|
.
Junior Member
Posts: 58
|
Post by . on May 11, 2015 12:00:43 GMT -5
it like italian mafia structure which best to keep intel among ourselves Teamspeak private meetings only for plans/tactics, no forum papertrail. Mafia want you to know something its whispered to you when no one is around, people left in dark about aspects that are not pertinent to them.
|
|